Freedom Social, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. 37 likes 2 talking about this. The only All-In-One Marketing Platform. Your entire online marketing presence in just 3 Clicks, powered by Artificial. Social media companies have been criticized for disproportionately restricting content that offends political progressives. For example, a Pinterest insider recently leaked documents showing that. Media freedom, freedom of various kinds of media and sources of communication to operate in political and civil society.The term media freedom extends the traditional idea of the freedom of the press to electronic media, such as radio, television, and the Internet.The term acknowledges that the media in modern societies consist of more than print sources. Freedom of speech: Social media and the public sector. Understanding the legal precedent behind free speech rights and how they apply to on and off-duty first responders. While some may see social media as restricting freedom of speech, it also enhances freedoms when it comes to getting a job. Some business use social media to conduct background checks that give a more accurate snapshot of the current individual, an opportunity for job-seekers to set themselves apart.
- Examples Of Social Freedom
- Social Media Sites
- Freedom Social Media Blocker
- Freedom Social Media Blocker
- Freedom Social Media
Examples Of Social Freedom
First Amendment of the US Constitution:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”
Section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms:
“2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
- (a) freedom of conscience and religion;
- (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
- (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
- (d) freedom of association”
On May 27th 2020, the American President lashed out at Twitter, claiming that they were interfering with his freedom of speech after they attached a link to an article about a claim that he made in a tweet that he had sent out. His responding tweet was “Republicans feel that Social Media Platforms totally silence conservatives (sic) voices. We will strongly regulate, or close them down, before we can ever allow this to happen. We saw what they attempted to do, and failed, in 2016. We can’t let a more sophisticated version of that….”
In my view, and the view of quite a few legal and political commentators, Twitter’s actions did not interfere with the president’s freedom of speech, as set out by the US Constitution. Twitter is a private entity, not the US Congress or government. The First Amendment of the US Constitution clearly restricts itself to the activities of the government where they might restrict a citizen’s rights. Twitter’s forum is owned by the company, and as such, is their private board. This is not to say that there are no restrictions on speech. Hate speech is oftentimes restricted, as are a variety of other things, like libellous and slanderous statements. However, Twitter choosing to fact-check a statement made by a politician is neither slanderous nor hate speech. The president calling on Congress to restrict Twitter’s activities on their own forum is, in fact, quite possibly a violation of the 1st Amendment (should they follow through with it).
In point of fact, Twitter has given politicians (including the president) a much wider range of behaviour than an ordinary user would get. For example, if I were to make public statements claiming, without evidence, that another private individual had committed a murder, Twitter would have suspended or banned my account and I would likely be facing either criminal charges or else a civil lawsuit. The president has made such accusations on Twitter and has faced no repercussions.
The truth of the matter is that there is an imbalance in how users are being treated on social media. Certain individuals have been getting away with making outlandish and inflammatory statements for years, and have faced no consequences. Twitter is finally reasserting ownership over their platform. This is in line with the actions of YouTube and Facebook over the previous two years when they de-platformed Alex Jones, and more recently when YouTube has begun to demonetize smaller, non-corporate, political commentators. Is this an attack on conservative voices? Given that many of the commentators that have been demonetized are left-leaning or centrists, it is clearly an indication that these social media platforms are reasserting their control and ownership over a platform that has become something of a wild-west style free-for-all.
In all of this series of posts, was there a violation of someone’s freedom of speech? Not yet. However, the president’s threats to regulate Twitter, if they continue to fact check him, is quite possibly a threat in violation of the 1stAmendment of the American Constitution.
Regulating social media is not only likely to be illegal, but it is pointless. If conservative voices are concerned about their being subjected to fact-checking by established private corporations, then the solution is quite simple. Get one of your many very wealthy supporters to bankroll the creation of a conservative-only rival to Twitter. Surely any one of the multitudes of millionaire and billionaire supporters of the president could afford to pony up the paltry few million such an endeavour would cost them.
Éamonn Brosnan is a research associate with the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.
Social Media Sites
The global rise of social media, over the last couple of decades, has been one of the most revolutionary manifestations of the digital computing era. It has enabled instant trans-continental communications, sharing and expression of ideas, providing a myriad of platforms for valuable discussions. With the tremendous proliferation of smartphones or Internet-Enabled mobile-devices, social media has surpassed Television, to become the main source of infotainment. Being a prominent social-media influencer, I believe that as this innovative industry grows rapidly, we need to evolve specific Cyber-laws and awareness campaigns, to put the responsibility on users, to ensure the safety, respect and well-being of other users on any digital platform. This will provide optimum freedom to our creative youth.
Today, well over 60% of US citizens get their news from social media sites. Over one billion Tweets about the US presidential election were recorded, while the presidential race was discussed on Facebook by 128 million accounts. These technologies have thus impacted all aspects of life, including: education, economy, healthcare, politics, etc. The performance and productivity of individuals has been significantly enhanced, by the instant access to a world of applications and solutions that help you achieve more, quickly and easily.
However, there is a need to regulate these fascinating digital facilities, to ensure the privacy and security of users and to safeguard the classified data of business enterprises. Sims 4 deluxe torrent mac. The policy makers must ensure the dignity of individuals and protect the social values in each community. Airing vulgar or derogatory content must be prohibited, with strict penalties and for the violators. Registration and verifiable-identification of participants is essential to minimise Anonymity to curb hate-speech, fake-news, insults, sabotage or black-mailing.
However, the relevant authorities must not act overly stringent about the liberal content shared on these apps by the contributors. The citizens must be given a fair amount of freedom to express their thoughts and creativity. Unfortunately, due to some malicious activities of a few social-media participants, the Government of Pakistan is currently considering a ban on some highly beneficial apps. It will surely be an excessively harsh reaction to the misbehaviour of a few individuals, if the whole nation is deprived of their right to produce creative content and share it through global connectivity. Any irrational decision will give a major setback to Pakistan’s digital progress. The only sustainable solution lies in educating the masses and creating awareness about the negative impact of misusing technologies.
Freedom Social Media Blocker
The regulators must consider that these popular social-media apps already have comprehensive policies, detection-mechanism and vigilance teams to check and proactively eliminate any inappropriate or harmful misinformation. In H2, 2019, TikTok removed 3,728,162 violating user-videos from Pakistan — one of the largest volumes of removed videos in a country. This app is also the leading platform for generating and sharing short video-clips. Specific ‘Community Guidelines’ for its Pakistani users have also been issued, to lead their creative efforts towards productive, entertaining and decent content.
The most popular platforms in the world like; Facebook Twitter, TikTok, YouTube, etc. promise complete transparency with security, to empower the masses by amplifying their voices, organizing virtual communities and minimizing the cost of international-interactions. Using these apps, the citizens can remain in sync with global knowledge and developments, to ensure continuous improvements in their quality of life. Over the years, Pakistan has nurtured numerous Social-Media celebrities, Travel V-loggers and influencers who enjoy international fame, while building a softer image of the country globally and generating healthy revenues for the economy.
Freedom Social Media Blocker
Freedom Social Media
Therefore, Social-networking is creating countless opportunities for creative expression and sharing of valuable ideas for positive inspiration and influence people. Progressive nations have optimized the role of such social-applications, to achieve socio-economic prosperity, while they are also deploying E-Governance technologies to reach out and deliver better services to their populations.
Khalid Malik is an actor, RJ and TV host.